Lululemon vs Patagonia shorts: resale price, speed and wholesale lots
Lululemon shorts resell for more and faster: a $25 median in 19 days, against $21 in 23 days for Patagonia. Used items, Poshmark sales, last 12 months.
Side by side
Same marketplace, same 12 months, used women's shorts only. Green marks the better figure for a reseller.
| Lululemon | Patagonia | |
|---|---|---|
| Median sold price | $25 | $21 |
| Typical sold price, middle half | $18–$35 | $16–$29 |
| Median time to sell | 19 days | 23 days |
| Sell-through | 53% | 55% |
| Sales, last 30 days vs the 30 before | −24% | −15% |
| Brand hub | Lululemon shorts | Patagonia shorts |
Sold price is the last listed price of a sold item. A brand pair page opens only when both brands have 300+ used sales in 12 months.
Buy Lululemon and Patagonia in bulk
Lululemon in other categories
Live Lululemon lots from vetted liquidatorsCompare and shop
Other brand pairs and the brand hubs, each with its median sold price.
Lululemon vs
- Lululemon vs Agolde$25 vs $38
- Lululemon vs Abercrombie & Fitch$25 vs $19
Patagonia vs
- Patagonia vs Levi's$21 vs $17
- Patagonia vs Athleta$21 vs $18
Brands and lists
- Lululemon shorts$25 median
- Patagonia shorts$21 median
- All shorts brandshub
About these numbers
Where the numbers come from
Completed Poshmark sales of used women's shorts by each brand over the last 12 months: both brands are read on the same marketplace, the same months and the same condition.
Sell-through is the share of listings that sold in the period. Time to sell is the median number of days from listing to sale. The sales trend compares the last 30 days with the 30 before.
A wholesale price shows only when a live lot of the same condition costs less a piece than the brand's used resale median.
Updated October 19, 2026.
Lululemon vs Patagonia shorts — questions buyers ask
Answers come from real Poshmark sales and live Closo lots, not from marketing copy.
