I remember sitting on the cold concrete floor of our primary third-party logistics (3PL) facility in early January 2024, surrounded by a literal mountain of grey poly mailers. We had just come off a massive Q4 for a mid-market apparel brand I was advising. Revenue was up, the Slack channels were full of celebratory fire emojis, but as I looked at the sheer physical mass of returns, the victory felt hollow. I realized then that we were facing a 5.3x return spike compared to our October baseline. It wasn’t just the volume that hurt; it was the realization that our accounting hadn’t fully braced for the impact on our unit economics. We had the top-line revenue, but the "profit" was currently sitting in plastic bags, waiting to be processed, graded, and potentially liquidated for pennies on the dollar.
I once watched a founder high-five their team over a $2M BFCM weekend, only to realize three months later that their actual contribution margin was nearly zero. The culprit was a fundamental misunderstanding of how returns inflate the cost of goods sold. When you’re paying $27 in total logistics and processing to retrieve an item with a $19 resale value, you aren't just losing a sale. You are actively eroding the health of your business. That’s when the technical definition of a metric stops being academic and starts being a survival requirement. The specific pain of carrier reliance—fuel surcharges, label costs, and the inevitable warehouse backlog—becomes the dominant story of your P&L.
What is COGS and Why Does it Matter to Operators?
In the simplest terms, what is COGS? It stands for Cost of Goods Sold. In a traditional retail world, you’d just look at what you paid the manufacturer and what you paid for the freight to get it to your warehouse. But in the world of e-commerce, where 30% of what goes out comes back, the cogs definition becomes much more fluid. It’s the total cost accumulated to get a product into a customer's hands and, crucially, the cost to handle it when they decide they don't want it.
Now the logistics math that matters starts with the cost of goods sold formula. Traditionally, it looks like this: Beginning Inventory + Purchases during the period - Ending Inventory = COGS. But as an operator, I look at the cost of goods sold equation and see the hidden "leakage." If you spend $5 on a shirt, $2 on inbound freight, and then $12 on a return label via UPS or FedEx, your cost for that single unit hasn't just increased—it has doubled or tripled. And if that item cannot be resold as new, you’ve essentially paid a premium to create a liability. (Yes, I’ve stayed up until 3 AM staring at Shopify reports trying to figure out why our gross margin looked so different from our bank balance, only to realize our "returns" were being categorized as marketing spend instead of inventory adjustment).
The Technical Reality of "What Does COGS Mean"
When we ask what does cogs mean, we are asking about the direct expenses of production. This includes:
-
Raw materials: The fabric, the plastic, the electronics.
-
Direct labor: The hands that built the product.
-
Overhead: The factory utilities and equipment depreciation.
-
Landed costs: The shipping and duties required to get the product to your door.
But for a DTC brand, "the door" isn't the final destination. The destination is the customer's mailbox, and in a high-return category like apparel, the journey is often round-trip.
What Does COGS Mean in Business vs. Operations?
If you ask an accountant, what does cogs mean in business, they will talk about tax liabilities and GAAP compliance. They want to make sure your ending inventory is valued correctly on the balance sheet so your net income isn't overstated. But if you ask a VP of Ops, what does cogs mean on the ground, they’ll talk about "landed cost" and "reverse logistics drag."
The landed cost includes everything from the manufacturing in Vietnam to the last-mile delivery and the inevitable return. Here’s where ops breaks: we often treat returns as an "Operating Expense" (OpEx) when they should really be viewed as an adjustment to our COGS. If an item is returned and can’t be resold at full price, your inventory value drops. If it sits in a ShipBob warehouse for six months because your returns team is backed up, you're paying "carrying costs" that eat into your potential profit.
The Misunderstanding of "Cog" and "Coger"
I’ve seen some confusion in global teams regarding the cog meaning. In a mechanical sense, a cog is a tooth on a wheel—a small part of a larger machine. In business, it's the same. Every return is a cog in your logistics machine. Interestingly, in international markets, I’ve seen search queries get messy with language barriers. For instance, what does coger meanor what does coger mean in Spanish is a frequent search, but it has absolutely nothing to do with business accounting.
In many dialects, what is coger is a verb that can range from "to catch" to much more vulgar connotations. Similarly, cogerme meaning or coger meaning in a linguistic context is entirely separate from the cogs meaning we discuss in a P&L. It’s a good reminder to be precise with your terminology when working with global 3PLs or manufacturing partners in Mexico or Spain. Stick to the acronym "COGS" or the full "Cost of Goods Sold" to avoid some very awkward Slack messages with your international logistics partners who might wonder why you're asking about "coger" in a shipping audit.
The Hidden Cost of the "Reverse" COGS
Most brands use tools like Loop Returns or Happy Returns to manage the front-end of their returns. These are fantastic for the customer experience. They make the portal look pretty, handle the "why" of the return, and provide the QR code. But the "back-end" is where the money disappears. In 2022, I worked with a high-growth footwear brand that was using a standard 3PL for everything. During their peak season, their warehouse space ran out because of a surge in returns.
The warehouse started charging "overstock" fees for returned items that hadn't even been inspected yet. We were paying $1.50 per square foot per month for "trash" (items that were ultimately unsellable due to wear). When we finally ran the cost of goods sold formula, we realized our COGS on returned items was actually 40% higher than on new items. We were literally paying to store failures.
Honest Failure: The Refund Delay Impact
We once tried to "save money" by only processing returns once a week. We thought it would optimize warehouse labor by having them do one big "batch." Instead, it created a refund backlog that triggered hundreds of "Where is my refund?" tickets in Zendesk. The CS team had to grow by two people just to handle the noise. But the real failure was the inventory. Because the items weren't being "checked back in," they weren't available for the next customer. We were out of stock on our best-selling sizes on the website while 400 units were sitting in a "to-be-graded" pile. Our cost of goods sold equation didn't account for the lost revenue of the inventory that was "dark."
Operators Always Ask Me: How do returns actually hit the P&L?
This is something every ops leader asks, and the answer is usually "it depends on how you categorize your labels." If you treat the cost of the return label as a marketing expense (to keep the customer happy), you are hiding the true cost of your product. If you treat it as part of your cost of goods sold equation, you get a much uglier, but much more honest, look at your business health.
I’ve seen brands that ignore the labor cost of "grading" returns. If a warehouse worker takes 4 minutes to inspect a dress, fold it, and re-poly it, that’s about $2.00 in labor. Add that to the $8 return label and the $1.50 3PL "in-processing fee," and you’ve spent $11.50 before you’ve even put the item back on the shelf. If the dress cost $15 to make, your COGS on that unit has effectively doubled.
Now, consider the "Yield Loss." This is the percentage of items that are returned but cannot be resold as new. If 20% of your returns have to be liquidated or donated, that loss must be baked into your what does cogs mean calculation. You aren't just losing the shipping; you're losing the manufacturing cost of that 20%.
Comparison: Warehouse vs. Local Routing Costs
Why "What Does COGS Mean" Changes at Scale
When you’re doing $1M a year, a $15 return cost is an annoying line item. When you’re doing $50M, it’s a threat to your EBITDA and your ability to raise your next round. At scale, the cogs definition must include sophisticated concepts like "Landed Cost Variance."
I once analyzed a beauty brand’s returns and found they had a 40% yield loss because of broken seals or used product. They were paying Narvar to track the package, UPS to ship it, and Optoro to manage the liquidation. By the time the dust settled, they were recovering about 10 cents on the dollar. So, what does cogs mean in business when the product is no longer sellable? It means you have to "write down" the inventory. That write-down goes straight into your COGS for the period, killing your gross margin. It’s a double whammy: you lost the sale, and you increased the cost of your remaining inventory.
Conversational Bridging: Here’s where ops breaks...
We have to stop thinking about returns as a "sunk cost" and start thinking about them as a "routing problem." The reason the cogs meaning becomes so painful is that we ship everything back to a central hub. We treat every return like it's a piece of precious cargo that needs to be inspected at the mothership. But why?
If a customer in Brooklyn returns a medium blue sweater, and another customer in Brooklyn wants to buy a medium blue sweater, shipping that item back to a warehouse in Ohio is a failure of logic. It adds fuel surcharges, label costs, and carbon emissions to the cost of goods sold formula for no functional gain.
We route eligible returns locally instead of sending everything back to the warehouse — cutting return cost from ~$35 to ~$5 and speeding refunds. This isn't just a "nice to have" for the environment; it is a fundamental shift in how you calculate your cost of goods sold equation. By using return hubs to keep items in their local markets, you eliminate the single biggest driver of reverse COGS: the carrier label.
Operators Always Ask Me: Is local routing actually secure?
I get this one at every conference. "But what if the neighbor or local seller steals the item? How do I trust the cog meaning of my inventory if it's in someone's living room?"
In our experience, the fraud rate in local, human-to-human handoffs is actually lower than in the anonymous carrier network. When you drop a box at a UPS drop-off, it’s a faceless transaction. The package goes into a bin, then a truck, then a sorting facility. When you use a local hub, there is an immediate inspection and a "chain of custody." The local seller has a vested interest in the quality because they are often the ones who will be fulfilling the next local order.
And let’s be honest, the current "secure" system of shipping items back to a 3PL results in a massive amount of "lost in transit" inventory anyway. I’ve had 3PLs lose entire pallets of returns that were "signed for" by the dock manager but never scanned into the WMS. At least with local routing, the inventory stays "live" and visible in a local market.
Honest Failure: The Over-Processing Trap
I’ve seen brands go too far the other way, too. We once worked with a luxury brand that had a 15-point inspection process for every return. They were so afraid of a customer receiving a "less-than-perfect" item that the labor cost to inspect a $200 silk shirt was $25. But the "opportunity cost" of that shirt not being on the site for three weeks was even higher.
The backlog grew so large that they had to rent a second "temporary" warehouse just to store the returns. We realized that by over-processing, we were inflating our COGS to the point where even reselling the item didn't make us profitable. Sometimes, "good enough" grading is the only way to keep your cost of goods sold formula from exploding. You have to balance the cogs definition with common sense. If the item looks new, put it back in stock.
What Does COGS Mean in the Age of Sustainability?
In 2025, the what does cogs mean in business question is increasingly being tied to carbon taxes and ESG reporting. Every mile a returned item travels adds to the "carbon COGS" of the product. If you ship a product 2,000 miles to a customer, and then they ship it 2,000 miles back, you have effectively tripled the carbon footprint of that single sale.
As regulations tighten, brands that rely on the "centralized warehouse" model for returns will see their costs rise not just from fuel, but from environmental levies. This is another reason why local routing isn't just a margin play—it's a future-proofing play. Keeping items local reduces the "miles traveled per unit sold," which is a metric that is going to be just as important as "customer acquisition cost" in the coming years.
Operators Always Ask Me: Can I handle high-value items with local routing?
A common question I see involves high-ticket items like electronics or designer jewelry. "Can I really trust a local hub with a $500 item?" The answer is that you probably shouldn't—at least not yet. For high-value items, the what is cogscalculation can afford the $15 shipping label because the margin is high enough.
But for the "Workhorse" SKUs—the $40 t-shirts, the $80 jeans, the $30 beauty kits—the traditional model is a death sentence for your margins. These are the items where the cost of goods sold formula is most sensitive to shipping and labor costs. If you can move 80% of your returns to a local model, you can afford to ship the 20% of high-value or "complex" returns back to a central specialist.
The Strategic Path Forward: Improving Your Gross Margin
If you want to improve your margins in 2025, you don't necessarily need a better manufacturer in a cheaper country. You need a better reverse logistics strategy.
-
Audit your "All-In" Return Cost: Stop looking at just the label. Use the cost of goods sold equation to factor in labor, warehouse space, and the "dead capital" of transit time.
-
Understand Your Yield: What percentage of your returns actually go back to "A-Stock"? If it’s less than 85%, you have a grading or a packaging problem.
-
Shorten the Loop: The longer an item is in transit, the higher its "effective" COGS because of the time-value of money and the risk of damage.
-
Localize Where Possible: Stop paying to fly polyester around the country. Use e-commerce returns hubs to keep items in their local markets.
Understanding the returns landscape means recognizing that the traditional 3PL model is broken for low-to-mid-priced goods. If your MSRP is under $100, the "ship-to-3PL" model is likely costing you 15-20% of your margin on every single return. That is money that could be going into product development or customer acquisition.
The "What Does Cogs Mean" Checklist for Your Next QBR
The next time you sit down for a Quarterly Business Review (QBR), don't let the discussion stay at the surface level. Ask these questions to get to the heart of your cogs meaning:
-
What is our 'Reverse Landed Cost'? This is the total cost to bring a unit back to a sellable state.
-
Are we including 'Return Shipping' in our COGS or our OpEx? (Hint: If it’s in OpEx, your Gross Margin is a lie).
-
What is the 'Inventory Velocity' of a returned unit vs. a new unit?
-
How much 'Fuel Surcharge' did we pay on returns last month?
By digging into these numbers, you’ll find that the "Return Problem" is actually an "Accounting Problem." Once you define the cogs meaning correctly, the solution becomes obvious: you have to stop moving the box so far.
But what about the tools?
We mentioned Loop, Happy Returns, and ShipBob. These are the standard enterprise tools for a reason—they work. But they are built on the assumption that shipping is unavoidable. They are optimized for a world where every box goes to a warehouse. When you add a layer like Closo, you aren't replacing these tools; you are giving them a more efficient "destination" for the physical goods they manage.
Conclusion: Balancing the COGS Equation
At the end of the day, the COGS meaning isn't just an accounting term—it’s the pulse of your operational efficiency. We’ve seen that by focusing on the "reverse" side of the house, brands can find millions of dollars in "found money" that was previously being handed over to carriers and 3PLs. We’ve moved past the era where we can ignore the cost of the "return trip."
My honest assessment? The current model of e-commerce returns is fundamentally unsustainable as shipping rates continue to climb and consumer expectations for "instant" refunds grow. We saw a 12% reduction in total logistics spend for a pilot brand just by implementing local routing in three major metros. The limitation, of course, is density; if you don't have enough customers in a specific zip code, you still have to rely on the traditional carriers like UPS and FedEx. But for the vast majority of DTC brands, the savings are just sitting there, waiting to be claimed.
It’s time to stop letting returns eat your profits. If you’re ready to see how the math changes when you stop shipping everything back to the warehouse, you should check out our Closo Brand Hub. We’ve built a system that fundamentally changes the cost of goods sold formula by removing the most expensive part of the equation: the national carrier.
Would you like me to run a custom "Return Cost Audit" for your current volume to see how much you’re losing to carrier surcharges?
